BENTONVILLE, Ark. – An attorney for Walmart who is also a member of the Bentonville, Arkansas school board wants to include “gender identity” to the district’s non-discrimination policy.

But the push to provide accommodations for transgender students could come with repercussions many parents might not like, according to Mat Staver, head of the Liberty Counsel, the Christian Examiner reports.

“The Walmart attorney needs to learn that discriminating between good and bad is what consumers do every day, and most agree that allowing boys to share a shower with their daughters is not good,” Staver said.

MORE NEWS: Know These Before Moving From Cyprus To The UK

“The push for transgender rights is all a part of the homosexual agenda to create sexual anarchy in order to destroy marriage, morality, and objective truth,” he said. “This is not civil rights; this is the abolition of civil rights. It is the deconstruction of objective reality and natural law.”

Bentonville school board members debated the transgender policy suggested by Walmart attorney Grant Lightle for about an hour May 4 before taking the advice of superintendent Michael Poore to wait on a decision until the Supreme Court rules on whether the Constitution allows same-sex couples to wed, 5 News reports.

“It seems to make sense to me that we do try and get out in front from doing it without really knowing where federal law could actually impact where we stand on this particular issue,” Poore said.

Board members received a three-page letter from the Liberty Counsel outlining reasons why the proposed policy change is a bad idea, including examples from Walmart stores where such policies have caused issues.

Starver cited a Montana man who “insisted on using the women’s restroom over the objections of nearly female employees” and would urinate standing up with the stall door open, the Examiner reports.

He also illustrated how adding cross dressing and homosexuality to the nondiscrimination policy in Fairfax, Virginia was followed by proposed changes in curriculum two days later.

MORE NEWS: How to prepare for face-to-face classes

Also, in the Las Vegas school district, a cross dressing kindergarten teacher infuriated parents when he confused young children by dressing like a women.

According to the Examiner:

The Liberty Counsel letter cites other examples, including that of Andrew M. Peterson, a kindergarten teacher in the Clark County, Nevada school district. Peterson taught “while engaging in distracting ‘gender identity or expression’ by cross-dressing in class,” Liberty Counsel said, was at the beginning of his “transition.”

With a contrived falsetto voice, makeup, a woman’s haircut, women’s clothes, and plucked eyebrows – the man presented a confusing figure to young children. This frustrated some parents who felt pressured speaking with 5-year-olds about cross dressing and sexual issues that went against their “religious, ethical and moral beliefs.”

Others who attended the Bentonville board meeting also believed sexual orientation should be excluded from the district’s nondiscrimination policy.

Resident Duncan Campbell believes “the Supreme Court has nothing to do with hiring policies,” and urged board members to reject the proposal immediately.

“I think it’s a mistake to wait because the community is now divisive,” he said, according to 5 News. “I do think it would make a difference if (the board) just said ‘we’re not going to do that.’”

Others believed any decision will cause legal trouble for the district no matter what board members decide.

“If the court rules one way, there are going to be lawsuits,” Benton County Justice of the Peace Pat Adams told board members. “If they rule the other way, there are going to be lawsuits.”

But at least one group is behind Lightle’s proposal: The Northwest Arkansas Center for Equality.

In a statement, the Center said, “Like all teachers, local LGBTQ teachers are talented professionals committed to helping Bentonville students succeed.

“How much longer must they wait before receiving the same basic protections as their straight colleagues? Superintendent Michael Poore’s suggestion that updating a local school district policy requires a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court is ridiculous and insulting. This vote reinforces that some teachers committed to educating Bentonville’s youth remain a second class in the eyes of the school district and at risk of discrimination.”