WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. – Palm Beach Lakes High School law academy teacher Malik Leigh said he was just being funny when he wrote a final exam question about presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.

But school officials aren’t laughing.

MORE NEWS: Know These Before Moving From Cyprus To The UK

Principal Cheryl McKeever called Leigh’s final exam “wholly inappropriate for the Law Academy class” and suspended the teacher Thursday pending an internal investigation, the Palm Beach Post reports.

According to WBTW, one of the contentious questions read:

If a Donald Trump becomes President of the United States, we are:

A. Screwed
B. Screwed
C. Screwed
D. Screwed behind a really YUGE wall that Mexico pays for.

Another read:

When performing an opening statement, it is best to:

A. Wink at the judge
B. Find the hottest person on the jury and focus your words on them
C. Speak to them as if they are cordial friends
D. Treat them like the MORONS they are.

“Specifically, the exam materials contain inaccurate content, irrelevant material, unprofessional use of language, inappropriate use of language, and contain content outside of and not consistent with the curriculum for the Law Academy,” McKeever wrote in a letter to Leigh, according to the Post.

MORE NEWS: How to prepare for face-to-face classes

Leigh told WPBF the questions came from inside jokes in class, and were designed as “gimmie” questions.

“If anyone gets offended, well, you kinda had to be there,” Leigh said. “You’re just upset you weren’t in on the joke.”

“I’m not pushing a political agenda,” Leigh told the Post. “To me, it was a funny question.”

The teacher’s suspension came one day after he attempted to subpoena McKeever to testify about the school’s decision not to renew his contract, or the contracts of several other teachers, for next school year.

Leigh is among a group of very vocal teachers backed by the local teachers union who do not particularly care for changes in staffing and the school culture since taking over the helm in 2014, according to the Post.

In a move to block the teacher terminations last week, Leigh alleged the McKeever’s decision not to re-hire them was an effort to “retaliate, harass, humiliate and intimidate teachers.”

Superintendent Robert Avossa said McKeever flagged the inappropriate test questions when Leigh submitted them for approval, before students took the test. He said the incident was not only clearly a violation of school policy, it was the latest in a series of questionable behavior by Leigh.

“This is an absolute no-no,” he said. “We send out information to our teachers regularly about staying away from individual political parties.”

“We saw some lesson plans and some tests, etcetera, that were brought forward that were reviewed before the kids took them which is good that means the principal is doing what she needs to do,” Avossa said. “However there were some surveys that were administered to the students that were absolutely not appropriate and that’s another piece to this puzzle.”

Ironically, Leigh and his like-minded colleagues argue in their feud with McKeever that staffing changes meant some students were forced to learn from substitutes for long stretches, a situation his own students now face because of his suspension.

Regardless, Leigh is adamant “there isn’t a single question (on his final exam) that’s inappropriate,” WPBF reports.

“Everyone will tell you most jurors are nimrods,” he told the Post.