DRESHER, Pa. – A Pennsylvania elementary school is “planning to reach out to local clergy and the Anti-Defamation League” over a paper airplane with a swastika on it that was thrown at a Jewish student.

Three Jewish students were reportedly sitting at a lunch room table when the anti-Semitic craft careened over their heads earlier this month. A parent emailed The Amber Gazette about the incident Tuesday, alleging that one of the boys reported the attack to an assistant principal, who brushed it off.

The boy then apparently reported the swastika plane to the principal.

MORE NEWS: Know These Before Moving From Cyprus To The UK

School officials told the news site the charge against the assistant principal is bogus, but vowed to make things right.

Because the paper airplane “included the use of a deeply offensive symbol, we are planning to reach out to local clergy and the Anti-Defamation League to assist us in presenting information to educate and remind our middle school students of the detriment of anti-Semitism, racial bias, and discrimination of every type,” principal Jill Clark wrote in an email, according to the Montgomery News, The Amber Gazette’s parent company.

“We immediately identified the student who drew the symbol and the student to whom it was directed. A though investigation ensued and parents of those intimately involved were notified,” Clark wrote.

The email also sets in motion a community meeting to discuss the insensitive stunt.

Congregation Beth Or Rabbi Gregory Marx said he hopes the childish prank isn’t getting more attention than it deserves, according to CBS Philadelphia.

“Kids are at a very impressionable age,” Marx told KYW Newsradio.  “They learn about hate on the Internet, they hear jokes in the school halls, and they think it’s funny and they think it’s cute to harass people sometimes.”

MORE NEWS: How to prepare for face-to-face classes

The paper plane debacle prompted a range of reactions online.

“What I want to know I what is happening about the assistant principal who allegedly dismissed the incident?” Jodi Fiagus Silverman posted.

Don Benn was appalled.

“The behavior of a middle school student can be understood and corrected. The behavior of an administrator (if accurate) is a different (and unacceptable) story,” he wrote. “As the parent of two Sandy Run alumni and a Human Relations professional I applaud the re-actions of the principal……but am appalled that no preventive measures (education) were already in place.”

Others brought up problems they’ve run into with Sandy Run’s assistant principal.

“The assistant principal needs to go!” L wrote. “He told me after almost an entire year of my kid being bullied ‘can you just let it go since school was ending for summer in a few days.’ That man has a lot of nerve! My situation was 3 years ago.”

Commenter Concerned Parent thinks the school has a good program to teach tolerance already in place that officials should build on.

“SRMS had a program that addressed some of the issues Dr Clark noted in her e mail earlier this year. It was the ‘Speak Up’ program. The main event was in the evening, and it was voluntary. The main speaker talked about bullying, racism, anti-Semitism, targeting students who are gay, etc,” Concerned Parent wrote.

“The kids that participated did a fabulous job, and the speaker (who acted out different parts to make his points) was amazing. Perhaps that is a program they can build on, to work with the entire student body.”