By Kyle Olson
EAGnews.org

CHICAGO – Teachers unions and their apologists constantly talk about the pressing need for a “fully funded” education system. We’ve yet to see anyone actually quantify that argument and clearly define what “fully funded” means.

In 2006, New Jersey school districts spent an average of $14,630 per student while the national average was around $9,138.  Does that mean New Jersey’s system is “fully funded”? Considering the fact that the statewide graduation rate is 83 percent, it seems the Garden State’s government education system has some problems to address. Of course the educrats  would reflexively say New Jersey schools need even more money to get the job done.

MORE NEWS: Know These Before Moving From Cyprus To The UK

Such is the case in Chicago. There, a union shill group, the “Chicago Teacher Solidarity Committee,” has been circulating a pledge form to gather names and contact information for union sympathizers who buy into the “money equals quality education” argument.

The language on the pledge form seems harmless enough.

“I support the Chicago Teachers Union. We recognize that teachers’ working conditions are students’ learning conditions. Teachers deserve to be fully compensated and schools should be fully funded. I pledge to stand with the teachers, whether they are forced to strike or not, in their fight for a fair contract.” (emphasis added)

There are those phrases again – “fully compensated” and “fully funded.”

What do they mean?

We sent a message to the gmail address listed on the pledge form to ask that question, because we’re genuinely interested in trying to nail down the amount of money it will take to increase Chicago’s 56 percent graduation rate. “Fully compensated” and “fully funded” couldn’t just be talking points, could they?  Surely somebody has asked this question before, haven’t they?  And somebody has an answer prepared, don’t they?

You be the judge.

MORE NEWS: How to prepare for face-to-face classes

Stavroula Harissis, who wrote on SocialistWorker.org that the CTSC was “first proposed by the Occupy Chicago Labor Outreach,” responded to my email:

“It’s difficult to quantify ‘fully compensated’ and ‘fully funded’ because there are a lot of variables in play – work hours, class size, curriculum quality, job security, etc. We are advocating that the budget and salary negotiations be considered with all of those things as priorities, rather than with charter schools and standardized testing and other private profit making endeavors as priorities.”

She then referred us to a document on the Chicago Teachers Union website.

So, in fact, she was really saying, “I don’t know, it’s not on my sheet of talking points, go ask the union.”

It’s obvious there is no amount of money that will fix the problems of government education. If there was, the problems would have been fixed long ago. The United States is among the world leaders in government school “investment,” and the returns have been disappointing for decades.

But citizens still fall into the trap of wanting a “fully funded” education system, whatever that means.

And “fully compensated” teachers? We think that’s already been accomplished in Chicago.

CBS2 reports the average Chicago teacher salary is $76,000 a year, and that doesn’t include benefits. The school district said that made Chicago’s teachers the highest paid in any city in the nation. The CTU disputed that, saying they’re the second highest – behind New York City. Big whoop.

But who cares about comparing teachers to teachers?  How about comparing them to private sector employees, who work 12 months a year, compared to nine months in a typical government school. The median household income in Chicago is $50,897, according to CLRsearch.com.

It seems as though Chicago’s teachers have it pretty good – likely better than Stavroula Harissis.  So what exactly is a “fully compensated” teacher?  One with a bigger pension and lower deductibles and co-pays for health insurance? Bigger sick leave payouts? Who knows?

But the talking points are working like a charm, especially with average citizens and an overly-compliant Chicago media that never presses the CTU and its allies to back up their absurd claims.