WASHINGTON, D.C. – Naomi Schaefer Riley of Philanthropy Daily makes the case for why subjecting students to failing schools is a civil rights issue.
From Philanthropy Daily:
The so-called community organizers have found another case of so-called disparate impact that they believe is another so-called civil rights violation. According to the New York Times, last week, the Department of Education is investigating complaints from people in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Newark that the closings of failing public schools discriminates against blacks, Hispanics, and students with disabilities. Activists (supported by the teachers unions) who have failed to stop school reform efforts on the local level are now appealing their case to the federal government. In Philadelphia, according to the Times:
Action United, a group that opposes the closings, presented data Monday showing that 80 percent of the students affected by the planned closings are black; the district’s enrollment is 55 percent black and 19 percent Hispanic. The group released a Dec. 18 letter it had received from the Education Department saying that the closing plan is subject to an investigation under the 1964 Civil Rights Act and two other laws that are enforced by the department’s Office for Civil Rights.
The schools that are being closed in these cities and others (including New York) are among the lowest performing ones in the country. At one of the schools in Philadelphia, according to an earlier Times piece, “Nearly 80 percent of . . . 11th-grade students read below grade level in statewide tests this year, while 85 percent failed to make the grade in math. Last year, about only a quarter of its students participated in precollege testing like the SAT.” Who is being hurt by the closing of this school?
A couple of years ago, New York held hearings to discuss the closing of some similar schools. The meeting went on for hours with students and teachers and parents berating then schools chancellor Joel Klein. I remember listening on the radio as students declared that the city’s closing of the school implies that the students themselves must be stupid. This is the line they have been fed by the unions. What parent or student would look at the kind of performance of these schools and suggest it is the fault of the students? Closing the schools suggests that the teachers have failed. Maybe the administration has failed. But the students?
And the idea that closing these schools is a violation of the students’ civil rights is a joke. Keeping them open is a civil rights violation. One reason to close these schools sooner rather than later is to make way for schools that might work better. And some of those might be charter schools. Charters, which are often much more successful than the schools currently in place — not a high bar, I’ll admit — often lack facilities. And the city could grant charters the right to use some of these buildings once they’re closed.